Wednesday, September 27, 2006
Do you like goulash?
Or does it weird you out?
Comments:
<< Home
I say, break a deal, face the wheel and if goulash is what comes up, so be it. Mel had to. so, i suppose it is better than being drawn and quartered
Personally - love goulash. Easy to make, cheap, great as leftovers and Malcolm will eat it till he explodes :)
i traveled the sands of zanzabar in search of the difference betwixed jelly beans. there is none. but twix are good too
no dude, naw.
goulash is just something yr mind made up to take the place of something that it wanted to forget, but could not so it replaced it with a tasty hungarian dish. when my bird died, all i could remember of it was cookies. weird. but definatly not for real
goulash is just something yr mind made up to take the place of something that it wanted to forget, but could not so it replaced it with a tasty hungarian dish. when my bird died, all i could remember of it was cookies. weird. but definatly not for real
by the way, what is in the goulash? i have never seen anything green in mine and it looks like there are beans in it too.
Couple thoughts on waiving/drafting/trading
I don't necessarily think that rosters have to remain with the same numbers of each position as it was in the beginning. I think that makes it a little difficult to make trades. I think the initial thought/reason for it was so that owners wouldn't automatically drop second kicker and second defense to pick up RB or WR that they never intend to use, and then when someone really needs someone (cause a player gets hurt) there is no one to pick up in a waiver.
So, from that long rambling, and since this is supposed to be fun, maybe we all just agree not to hoarde any specific position and go with there not needing to be a specific number of positions filled on the roster. Just as long as you have the right number to play each week.
I don't necessarily think that rosters have to remain with the same numbers of each position as it was in the beginning. I think that makes it a little difficult to make trades. I think the initial thought/reason for it was so that owners wouldn't automatically drop second kicker and second defense to pick up RB or WR that they never intend to use, and then when someone really needs someone (cause a player gets hurt) there is no one to pick up in a waiver.
So, from that long rambling, and since this is supposed to be fun, maybe we all just agree not to hoarde any specific position and go with there not needing to be a specific number of positions filled on the roster. Just as long as you have the right number to play each week.
Commissioner says:
I think that for waiving/drafting the rosters need to stay the same. Don't want people to waive kickers and defenses to pick up positional players and horde them so that when someone needs a back-up they are digging through the dregs trying to fill a spot.
Trades do not have to be that way. As long as it is a legitimate trade, it can be done.
Thoughts - concerns?
I think that for waiving/drafting the rosters need to stay the same. Don't want people to waive kickers and defenses to pick up positional players and horde them so that when someone needs a back-up they are digging through the dregs trying to fill a spot.
Trades do not have to be that way. As long as it is a legitimate trade, it can be done.
Thoughts - concerns?
i read an interview w the guitarist from Audioslave talking about how Chuck D made fun of elvis and he said he was glad someone had the stones to say what he was thinking.
so, seriously, where my BK at?
(and i understand (in case granny goodeye reads this) that it is impropper to end a sentence (even a question) with a preposition)
Post a Comment
(and i understand (in case granny goodeye reads this) that it is impropper to end a sentence (even a question) with a preposition)
<< Home